1. Sometimes.
2. Usually.
3. No Answer - #2 wasn’t a Yes.
-------------------------------------
Ha, you thought you'd get short answers out of me. No way dude.
OK Seriously:
And as a reader, do you accept the message being given to you? Well it would depend on the message and how it is presented. An author certainly has the right to present a message – I mean after all it’s his words. But I as a reader have my own responsibilities. Those are mostly to myself but partly to the author. If the author has a good idea of his message and articulates it well I can accept it. I don’t always agree but then not everyone’s life experiences are similar. If the author has presented well, I can enjoy a story without fully endorsing the message. However, if I feel the author, in presenting his message shows no regard for the possibility that my experiences bring a different perspective than that, which he is trying to convey I usually move on to a different story or in the extreme a different author.
Do you read these things and clearly SEE the message being brught to you? I’m usually aware of the difference between surface and deeper content, if there’s deeper content available. It’s not always intended to be there. I’m assuming Com for discussion and as the question implies that a message exists that’s not necessarily the obvious one. Yes.
If yes, does that turn you off in the way of reading a story, feeling like you're being brainwashed? That would depend on how it’s presented. If it’s an offer presented to me in a way that makes me think then I’m OK with that (whether I agree or not is another matter). If the author is inflexible in presentation, implying that If I don’t agree, then I’m summarily dismissed then naturally the story becomes unenjoyable. The danger here for authors is to go overboard on some message they have to present and do it badly enough that a reader moves on.
I sent this to EggMan brcause of an attack by someone with a thoughtless post but it applies to anyone who tries like you Com and Jaimie.
Words I agree with:
"It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena; whose face is marred by the dust and sweat and tears; who strives valiantly; who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions and spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best, knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who, at worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly; so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory or defeat." THEODORE ROOSEVELT
Jaimie, I really enjoyed 'The Stag Party' my latest read. You fooled me with the ending. Sigh...
Com, What can I say I haven't already said.
ComRocks - sounds like PopRocks, Is that FOOD. Me tinks so.