QUOTE (Rose Strailo @ June 6 2008, 12:34 AM)

I really should look at this stuff more often..
Anyways, Kevin, dear, *hugs.* Thank you for your words.
I'm glad that I can make a poem enjoyable, while still having a good edge to it. 
Well you certainly did and that's a rare and powerful talent! This is definitely a poem I intend to read again.
Which is saying something, because 85-90% of the literature, movies, television, etc. that I experience - even if I really really like it - I
don't have any desire to experience again. I'm the sort of person who likes a surprise and savours something while experiencing it. So I read things very slowly and carefully, I stop and ponder before I continue, and I'll re-read within the same sitting. Similarly, I've often paused movies and DVDS and rewound them to watch a scene over again before I go on, or simply stopped them for awhile to reflect on things. Once I'm done though, once I've watched it, or read it, and had my contemplation and my discussion, I'm usually done. As I said, I like a surprise, so even if it's completely awesome I usually don't bother to experience it again unless I've somehow managed to forget most of it. I will continue to talk about it, and try to remember what I was feeling when I first experienced, and what I was originally thinking, but I yeah, seldom 'do it again'.
This poem though is in the minority of literature (or any art, except possibly visual/painting art - although even there I think the deepest experience is often in the first viewing/pondering/feeling) that I definitely do intend to experience again. This is probably because not only is the message of the piece powerful and moving, BUT most importantly the meter and rhythm make it something more akin to music, something which can delight the mind the tongue and ears over and over. However, the thing that definitely brings it all together and nails it is that last couplet. I suspect as long as I continue to read the piece with care that last couplet will continue to affect me.
On a side note, I have to say that this 're-readability' if you will, is probably the number one thing I get out of poetry that I don't get out of most literature. A good poem is a joy to be read from a linguistical and auditory point of view, and this presentation of the emotion often manages to make it powerfully enduring. I won't say I prefer poetry to standard literature, indeed if for some bizarre and twisted reason I had to 'choose', I'd almost certainly go with standard literature, but I will say that they're fundamentally different IMO and the pleasures to be gained from each are very different. The best literature is both beautiful and intellectually and emotionally moving; the best poetry is similarly both beautiful and intellectually and emotionally moving. However, 'decent' or 'acceptable' literature doesn't
necessarily have to be beautiful, and 'decent' or 'acceptable' poetry doesn't
necessarily have to be intellectually and emotionally moving.
In any case, however, "Twirling, Swirling" is both

-Kevin