QUOTE (C James @ June 29 2008, 10:34 AM)

I too just finished "The road not taken". I found it especially poignant, particularly the double whammy Steve gets at the end. He'd assumed so much, only to have it proven not quite so. The irony was palpable about John, who turned out happy and well adjusted.
The part about Steve's father was not cut and dried; with his own son he may well have been harsher on the gay issue, or perhaps not. However, Steve closed that road to himself, along with so much else. One wonders where the branching point was. My guess; the kiss, and what might have happened had it not been interrupted.
Thanks for the comments, CJ!

I think that it is likely there were many possible branching points, but (as you spotted!) the interrupted kiss was probably the most important.
Steve's own closed mind and fixed assumptions were his major problems. His father was probably more of an imagined problem than a real problem.
TRNT was my first experiment with a protagonist who had a seriously flawed character, so it couldn't realistically have a very happy ending. However, at the end Steve has seen that there is something wrong with his life and if he takes steps to put it right there is potential for him to find happiness in future. I believe that realising and accepting that there is indeed a problem is the first step in solving it.
I hope you enjoy my other shorts. My own personal favourite is Just Visiting. In many ways it is the antithesis to TRNT.
QUOTE (Graeme @ June 29 2008, 10:51 AM)

I think a lot of readers want the emotional investment that comes with reading a multi-chapter story. It is more difficult for them to gain that attachment from a short story, and hence harder for them to comment.
Hi Graeme!

I like your illumination analogy.
Yes, I suppose there is less to comment about in a short story, as well as less emotional involvement.
Personally, though, I find that when I read a really good short story it can have more of an effect on me and be even more memorable than a multi-chapter story. To use your analogy, I think that seeing one item illuminated well can make it more impressive and more memorable than seeing it as just another object in the room.
The two formats, short and multi-chapter, serve different purposes and suit different tastes or moods. Sometimes, especially when my reading time is limited, I prefer the 'hit' of a good short story. Other times I prefer to wallow in a long and engaging novel. Just as sometimes I'm in the mood for a smoked salmon and champagne snack, but other times I want to sit down to a gourmet banquet.

QUOTE
Oh, and, I'm sorry to say, I've only read one of your short stories,
Timing, but I certainly enjoyed it.

Thanks!

Those who've read both Timing and Perspective might see that the the former is a lighter and less in-depth treatment of a similar basic idea that is seen in the latter.
Kit