Just read through everything and what comes to mind is that geeky guy Urkel:
Did I do that?QUOTE (dkstories @ August 16 2008, 01:49 AM)

Don't forget my position on offshore drilling?
Folks in the heartland don't get to decide if folks in Florida have rigs off their shore. Florida gets to decide.
Oh, and if there's a spill, Florida gets to pay for it without a single penny from the other people in the country. Let's have some personal responsibility here.
Amen brother!
QUOTE (Demetz @ August 17 2008, 09:23 PM)

Well... offshore drilling has next to no support here so that wouldn't be much of an issue
Florida's actually much more interested in ethanol-based fuel.
Maybe the state is going to get into ethanol production - especially with the governor’s play for the Everglades from US Sugar. After all, it was sugar-based ethanol that was such a success for Brazil. Get them to switch from corn, which is used in so much of our food chain. Besides, Americans could use a little less sugar in their diet…

QUOTE (TalonRider @ August 18 2008, 02:47 PM)

QUOTE (dkstories @ August 15 2008, 12:23 PM)

Do you want nuclear plants built in your state? Okay. You can have them on ONE condition. YOU must store the radioactive waste from those new plants in YOUR state, permanently. No shipping your radioactive waste to other states. You store it where if something goes wrong, YOU die, not the people in another state and you can have all the nuclear power plants you want.
Been there, done that. I've got one in my back yard, so to speak. I live within 10 miles of the Limerick Nuclear Power Plant. The sad thing about it, the area doesn't benefit from it. The power gets sent to out of state.
Good point – if we are going to get off-shore drilling and/or nuclear power and we have to deal with the mess ourselves, then the output can’t be sold across the state lines…