knotme
October 23 2006, 02:17 AM
I just read all six chapters to date in one go, then let them sit and perk for a while. My first reaction: nice story line! John's family--especially his father--was a powder keg waiting for a light. The story starts just before the explosion, and we get front row center seats for both the explosion and a developing love interest. Nice!
About the forum discussion on holes in the characterizations, I would say that the plot line has gotten ahead of the motivations--motivations consisting mainly of character development and background information.
This is not necessarily bad. 
The author
might want to seize a break in the action as an opportunity to backfill some motivation; or he might choose to leave us hanging.

I guess it depends where he wants the center to be: on the family crisis, or on the developing love interest.
Like other posters, I was puzzled by the actions in the kitchen. Why did the mother hit the father repeatedly? (Fury? Demonstrating her authority?) Why didn't the father hit back? (Chivalry? Guilt? Subservience? Too stunned to respond,
NOT.) Why did the daughter hit the mother hard enough to get arrested? (Desperation? Is she growing up to be a batterer, too?)
It might help the author to know how one reader has filled in the holes in motivation. I am guessing, but so what. From Chapter 3,
QUOTE
I still remember the first time he did that to me. I was ten years old. He was watching T.V. and I walked up to ask him a question about my history homework. He didn’t even stop watching the game. He just said, ‘Get back in there and do your damned homework.’ I didn’t even get to ask him to help me fill out this family tree we were given. That was my first failing grade. I still have that paper. I told myself that I would get rid of it when I didn’t feel rejected any more, the bad part is, Dad never let that feeling go away, always kept feeding it, letting it grow.
we see that the father was ill suited to that role
before he left for war. I'm guessing that his superiors took advantage his nasty qualities, used him up, and then, in a gross dereliction of duty, threw him back as is into society.
One theory: the domineering mother: John's mother is strong and domineering. His father held his own quite well before leaving for war, but when he returned and struggled to fit back into the family, the mother got the upper hand and has run things behind the scenes ever since. The father is bitter and lashes out at others. The mother pushed the father to "straighten John out". Jamie is onto her mother and that's why Jamie lost her temper and clobbered mother.
Alternate theory: the good hearted mother as frog in a warming pot: The mother didn't realize her mistaken choice of spouse until kids were born and the cost of divorce, high. The war raised stakes and turned her mistake into a disaster. Yet, as the father deteriorates, she does what she must to hold the family together and never files for divorce. If everyone comes out of this alive, they'll be lucky.
I'm probably way off base. If so, part of the reason is that the mother is a cypher so far. She could use a little more description. On the other hand, John may not be able to provide that. Note that all kids and most or all adults in this story have names except "mother" and "father". I certainly relate to that; I didn't call my parents by name, ever. This lack of names puts me in the story with John and partially explains the lack of motivation. We're seeing what John sees. At fifteen, he's not going to see what an omniscient adult narrator would see. I can go with that.
So far, the title seems weird. I could never face Mondays if they were anything like this.